Make reports use less disk space
Reports with images can be pretty big, especially when comparing 100+ variables. A comparison of some GOES-R level 2 outputs, 104 variables total, is about 73MiB.
The bulk of the space is going to images. Here's a typical single variable:
Size (KiB) | File |
---|---|
1,452 | TOTAL |
217 | A.png |
202 | B.png |
135 | Hex.png |
88 | Diff.png |
80 | AbsDiff.png |
76 | small.A.png |
74 | small.AbsDiff.png |
73 | small.B.png |
72 | Mismatch.png |
72 | Hist.png |
70 | small.Diff.png |
64 | DensityScatter.png |
62 | small.DensityScatter.png |
60 | small.Mismatch.png |
47 | small.Hex.png |
27 | small.Hist.png |
9.6 | index.html |
These are big enough to be a nuisance to hand around. If we could shrink them, it would be helpful.
Possible techniques to make things smaller:
- Use the option to not generate images if a given variable passes the similarity test.
-
Don't generate
small.*
images; use the originals directly and rescale in browser. It will use more browser memory, CPU, and bandwidth., but I don't think it's significant. This might save about 30% of the space. -
Higher compression levels. perhapsProbably not; Going from compression 6 to 9 saves about 2%, turning on optimization saves nothing (indeed, it grows a bit!).compress_level=9, optimize=True
? (default iscompress_level=6, optimize=False
).
Comparison of compression levels:
Size (B) | Time (s) | compress_level | optimize |
---|---|---|---|
1,590,874 | 2.74 | 1 | False |
1,447,641 | 4.44 | 6 | False |
1,414,188 | 20.09 | 9 | False |
1,416,435 | 19.97 | 9 | True |
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS. More information